Home » no more than: A Simple Definition

no more than: A Simple Definition

by Radhe

There is no such thing as no more than. However, because this statement is so commonly used, it is important (and sometimes confusing) to know the difference between the two words. When we say “no”, we are simply saying that the action we are doing is not expected, it is not required, it’s not a given, and it is not a given that’s good for us.

We could just as easily say, “No, of course not. We are doing this because we want to.” We are just saying that the action we are doing is not needed, it is expected, and it is not expected to be good for us.

In the case of no, it is not a negative thing, it is simply not needed. It is not needed to be good for us, it is just not needed, not needed. In the case of no, it is not a bad thing because there is no bad thing about it. We could just as easily say No, of course not. We are doing this because we want to.

We could also say No, of course not, we are doing this because we want to. We are just saying that we have no idea what we are doing, and it is a waste of time. However, that is what we have said in the past.

I feel that there is something wrong with this conversation. I don’t know what the answer is, but I feel that we seem to be making this a bad thing and therefore it is not a good thing. There is no such thing as a waste of time.

It is a waste of your time, and therefore a bad thing. I am only asking you to consider the consequences of your actions. There is no such thing as a waste of your time, or a bad thing. There are no bad things.There is only you and your time. I just feel that there is a better way.

In the end, if you don’t consider it a good thing, then what you do isn’t a good thing. You could just go out and do something else with your time. Maybe you have a class to teach or something. But the question is, what would you have to gain? You would have to spend that time somewhere else, and you might not even like it.

People who are good at doing things don’t just do them; they use what they do best. This is one of the reasons I’m against wasting time on things that are pointless or bad. If you think you can just do it and enjoy yourself then you can. If you think you can just waste time on things that are bad, then you are depriving yourself of the very things that you are trying to do.

There are two types of time-wasters: those who waste their time and those who don’t. The reason you don’t waste your time on pointless pursuits is because you know it is pointless. You might be in the middle of something important, something you are desperate to do, something you can’t do anything about. Your brain automatically goes into time-wasting mode when these things happen. You are not doing anything productive.

You may also like

Leave a Comment